If we needed to return everything that we took from natives many of us, if not all, would be homeless. I get pleasure from, lead to I discovered just what I was taking a look for. "a Nitrogen Air-Conditioning Hall has been built in Athens where the Caryatids will be sheltered and protected from the city's pollution. Stealing is wrong. I believe such objects are treasures of humanity. And now they want to buy your islands. These were someone's son/daughter, mother/father, husband/wife. And as final, this does not belong to my reasoning, the muslim brotherhood is in charge right now, they are not so much fan of all those ancient things, they think it is offensive, and would love to destroy it. It's not their right to take something that doesn't belong to them. Would it be ok for us to decide that Iraq and Afghanistan are to become colonies of the US and start moving people there and taking stuff from their museums? However, these artifacts are rife with debate regarding claims to ownership. Americans would have a fit. 11513 Should ancient artifacts return home Science Buzz from MATH 151 at Shoreline Community College. Anonymous girl who goes to skool and does debates says: the same Anonymous girl that goes to scool and does debates says: The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly. People who truly want to see them, can just as easily visit the countries and cultures whose ancestors created them. I think returning the artifacts sound good at first, but after for few months of thinking about it "return it". As for museums keeping things on "long term loan", that's thin too, seeing as how there's no acutal "term" to define just how long a "long term loan" is. This is not for endulging your past history. . I think that the artifacts should be put back where the people found them. The funds can be spent on charitable organization. O Engaging with digital reproductions is more desirable than interacting with the physical art object in person. think about it why should you leave the artifacts in the places were you found them??!! We did contribution to take care of each others' children when their families are in trouble, but we will do crime if we refuse to return the child to their own parents. It is like stealing rich people's money because you think you can better spend/keep/invest it. Greeks lost the marbles when the country was under the Ottoman empire. Yes, during the decline of the Ottoman Empire Westerners stole so much from Ottoman lands. They may be descendent's, but no one is 'connected' to their lineage some 2,000 years back. However, there is no talk of returning theland; and rightfully so.". They weren't all stolen. Therefore, if it is proven by due documentation that any given peice of a collection was wrongfully - or erroneously - accquisitioned, then the given object should be deaccquisitioned to the proper authorities who should then make the decision as to whether to return the artefact to a private owner. Group of answer choices a. Yarn b. Glitter c. Silly Putty d. Sanitary napkins, Question 3 1 pts What does Jia Jia Fei mean by art being a social object? ah, such controversy, I'm still having trouble starting my paper on this subject. on. A group of indigenous people of New Zealand, the Maori, have also been very influential in their international requests for the return of sacred artifacts and human remains. just think about this.now there are laws that when another county wishes to take an artifact from its county of orgin they need permission from the government and they would exchange it for money. The problem, at its centre, is a debate of Internationlism and Nationalism. Don't make the tired statement, "this is different." But as tourists and visitors, not as thieves. I don't think anyone is promoting looting however the point they are trying to make is that realistically some countries (especially third-world countries) main concern is not of the preservation of artifacts so that future generations can learn from, but they hope that by acquiring these artifacts it will give themselves more power. It was used in the family for 500 years and shelved around 1720 right here in the good old USA. When Dynasty changes, new king will destroy previous heritage. That's not culture that's barbarian. Like if a special rock was found in afganistan or Egypt, whatever, it should be placed in a museum in that country. It is downright infuriating that people in the West have been stealing artifacts from other countries for centuries now. Well, I personally think we should retuen the artefacts. Consumer, 5. They dont have the resources to take care of these artifacts and are in many problems right now that can effect the artifacts in a negetive way. It just shows how selfish you, are, you think there aren't GOOD museums in other countries? It sounds nonsense right? Its not a simple answer. But when I go to Greece or Egypt I do not want to go to France and England to find out the history's of the other nations. It would then be the tribal council's responsibility to decide the fate of the object, a decision which would require proper identification and documentation. Even Iran is governed by Arabian people mostly, so the best solution is to let it be kept by the people who found it, returning it to whom they desire. Should ancient artifacts return home? - sin.motoretta.ca If we were to loose the declaration to england because, terrorist attacks make the east coast an unstable home the i believe, I agree with you.. Some archaeologists are nervous that the return of the Elgin marbles or the Rosetta Stone will open the, "flood-gates" for the return of hundreds if not thousands of artifacts. Look what happened to the Bagdad museum! But Greeks want to tell their own history, and that requires powerful objects as well as the respect of other nations. I also think its so sad that some countries can't even see their cultural belongings as they are so far away. Main Menu; by School; by Literature Title; by Subject; . I am doing some reading on cambodian art an have read how they took statues out of the country back in 80's and 90's. I say we rebuild this world before going off on an expedition to find information about our collective past. should artifacts stay where they r now and why?? I'm doing a debate on this subject in school. In different situations, different acts are required. Talking about this point, can be a never ending story.Who to blame in this three points? . MANY of the objects which are under debate such as King Tut's tomb, his burial headdress and his belongings which reside in England and many other artifacts where taken out of countries a LONG time ago. Britain has sent back to Egypt some 25,000 ancient artifacts from Britain, some dating as far back as the stone age, Egypt's culture minister said on Thursday. Artifacts such as the Rosetta Stone in London and the Nefertiti's statue in Berlin both of which were taken away from Egypt illegally are generating millions of dollars every year for those museums and plays a big role in the tourist industry for those cities.So the question for those governments and museums is weather to do the right thing while suffering huge financial consequences. Science Buzz is supported by the National Science Foundation. Nor does it address whether objects were in fact taken "legitimately." They have a website at: http://repatriation.ca/index.htm M6 Video Quiz- The Power of Cartoons .pdf, Topic_ Module 9 - Current Events_ Ethical Issues in the News.pdf, Topic_ Module 4 - Current Events_ Ethical Issues in the News.pdf, Topic_ Module 3 Current Event_ Ethical Issues in the Real World.pdf, Topic_ Discussion_ The end of the Century of Immigration, the Roaring 20's and WWI.pdf, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University HUMN 330, Oakton Community College, Des Plaines SPE 103, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University HUMM 330, Score 05 05 Question 13 1 point Discuss some gender differences in how we, Stuviacom The Marketplace to Buy and Sell your Study Material Copyright 2019 F A, Question 5 Correct Mark 067 out of 100 Flag question Question text A mass of 04, Excel - Extra Practice solution (student).xlsx, fhe addition or removal of electrons from a neutral atom has a drastic effect, Question 6 1 1 pts Which theory of medias impact emphasizes the reciprocal link, The budget variance for fixed factory overhead for the normal volume practical, And he pointed and said Through those doors there But Ill be keeping an eye on, Which of the following statements about memory is false A Memories are copies of, What is the general rule regarding use of the consumption method for recognizing, 30964 09 May 1988 It may also involve a complaint against both the company and, San Sebastian College - Recoletos de Manila, Foundation of Special and Inclusive Education- Week 3(Navarez, Katrina M.).docx, Central Bicol State University of Agriculture - Sipocot Campus, Paper 4 Fundamentals of Business Mathematics and Statistics Syllabus 2008 The, Explain the purpose of external data representation XDR Ans Data can be, PTS 1 DIF Cognitive Level Apply Application REF Pages 17 27 28 TOP Nursing, Hyderabad College of Science & Technology, Hyderabad, porcupine Their tornado was in this moment an inmost verdict Few can name a, Which of the following materials is included in Wangechi Mutu's Complete Prolapse of the Uterus ? This is like sending a painter to the country where his inspiration lies, not in a city centre where the best drawing facilities can be bought. I have no particular opinion on the Parthenon or any other issue of contention. But, if the country of origin cant afford to keep it in good condition they should just probably just leave it in the other countries museum. a. Now, there is the issue of past collection and maintenance that England (I'll use the Egyptian artifacts as an example) went through in the last 100 or so years. It is far to simplistic to say "yes return them"! Say a state museum is holding an Iriquois treasure obtained from a village when sacked by US Cavalrymen. In the past few decades, some governments have politely asked for objects that they feel have been pillaged from their countries to be returned. His comments were made after the Metropolitan Museum in New York had said at the time that it would return 19 small objects from King Tut's tomb to Egypt. 4) Last but not least, what about artifacts that are from countries that have stability and financial power to take care of them? i think that the artifacts should stay in egypt. Where do these objects belong? There are many pieces here which could be on loan to other countries, creating interest in Scotland's history, while other pieces should be brought back to Scotland eg "The Declaration of Arbroath" and "The Wallace Safe Conduct Letter". 11513 Should ancient artifacts return home Science Buzz. Think of Los Angelos and the looting that happens after earth quakes. What does the Taj Mahal mean to India? Last Update: May 30, 2022. This article from the Wall Street Journal summarizes many of these issues, and offeres a nice solution: ownership of objects may revert to the country of origin, but the objects themselves can stay in their current museums on long-term loan. Egypt says that if the museums don't return the artifacts in question, archaeologists who work in those museums will not be allowed to continue digging in the "Land of the Pharaohs". I agree that objects found now should reside in their country of origin or where they are found BUT artifacts taken from countries lets say before WWII don't have to be returned. To ask for entire collections or portions of them to be returned when they were legally obtained is UNREASONABLE! Wherever we were born and feel connected to is our nationality, its not about where your ancestors came from. With something like an artifact that is made of wood, it can't be in a very wet/cold country, or a very humid country, it would decay. And, hey guys, we are not in the 18th century. But what about when they take his favorite pocket knife that never left his pants pocket? Theres the issue of whats best for the artifact. And besides usually it's just the rich nations stealing from the poor ones, in the name of "preservation and good care"! . that's what i don't like about claiming artifacts and such. And this is no different. What do the paintings in the Sistine Chapel mean to Italy? Unlike many illicit materials (and stolen artefacts, by nature of being wrongfully obtained, are illiicit materials), ownership and a papertrail should exist and provide adequate evidence of whose rightful property such objects are. The cultures that artifacts represent are not the same as the people living in the country now. Is the acquisition of foreign artifacts one of those things? I think that the stollen monuments should return to their home country only if the government of their home country could preserve them properly in siutable musueums and make them accessible to their visitiors like the Greek government and the Egyptian one who are able to preserve their monuments. I mean, one day human trafficking and slavery are legal, and then all of a sudden they're not?! Theft remains theft. What is Groundhog Day and do the forecasts work? Egypt has no cultural claim to these aretfacts whatsoever. We saw a completely white squirrel today on our walk to the end of our street and back. Yes, I suppose a society, or the people in it, needs to know that contracts and agreements will be held true. Like injustice reparation has a 'Best before' sign on it. To the native American (by the way I am a native American as well) I bet you did not know that there was over 14,000 Native Americans that fought against the British on the side of America in the American revolution. Should ancient artifacts be returned? - Politics Forum.org | PoFo Your rating: None Average: 4.4 (80 votes), The Magical Number Seven Plus or Minus Two. 11513 Should ancient artifacts return home Science Buzz | Course Hero Does anyone have any ideas for five reasons they should return home? Its too risky and very dangerous. May be you can give more points . I'm doing a paper on this subject and yes, I believe, if they were in any way moved to another country in the past, the country that houses the original dig site should have everything returned. There are already laws that does not allow for theft. Greece's Minister of Culture; Elgin Marbles, Archaeology Online News; British Museum; Elgin Marbles, www.sciencebuzz.org/_ancient_artifacts_return_home If anyone is interested, the Science Museum of Minnesota has a Policy Statement on Collections Management, which includes how we adhere to the NAGPRA guidelines. I also think that postcolonial nations need to give countries of origin the right of refusal for objects taken illicitly or illegally. Gephyrophobia: Fear of crossing bridges is now in Childhood nightmare spotlight: raccoon poop brain Read the latest discussions on the Buzz Blog. i say finders keepers. Wipe out it completely. If they find an artifact the person who found it should let the country of origin choose if it should be in a museum or should be in the country of origin. Course Hero uses AI to attempt to automatically extract content from documents to surface to you and others so you can study better, e.g., in search results, to enrich docs, and more. They also should need to demonstrate an ability to care for the items-but ultimately who are "we" to decide that. In most cases this is true. That entity should then decide the article's fate, as is its right. 3 Another way to preserve artifacts of international interest is to keep them in the UN headquarters. Group of answer choices a. Embroidery b. the titanic for example we wouldn't know what was on the titanic. In most cases the ancient artifacts that are displayed in the major musuems of the world were obtained with the complete knowledge and consent of the countries from which they came. Now, more essoterically, who should have proprietorship over treasures of [no longer extant] civilizations? That being the case they should remain where they are. We have to remember that, no matter how long ago they died or were found, that these were real people. I think that artefacts should be returned to place of origin, in terms of ethics, but as you note, it depends on correct conservation methods. they should stay where they were found and nobody should have the right to take the artifacts from where they belong. I like the artical about the ancient artifacts that have to come home. The Muslim government and people have butchered the original Egyptians. It isn't necessarily finders keepers. Even if they had no children and are no one's ancestor, they are a human being and deserve to be treated with respect. If you find an antient artifact you should do some research on it before you decide to give it away. Can you guarentee that won't change next week? I mean you found it you deserve a thanks! A lot of arguments are made by museums holding such artifacts in foreign countries but it will be easier to understand their reluctance if you simply considered the amount of money they are generating by keeping them:). Also, in a way, the conquering armies earned the artifacts. It is an sad part of human history that things we just taken and those in power deem themselves the only ones capable of caring for an artifact. I like your input. What if we could decide on letting other countries keep them until the country was able to take care of it. I could argue that we all originated from Africa anyway, so your point is invalid. Greece? I think that the musem should not return the artifacts they took a very long time tring to discover them thay found them so were is a thanks from egyp that they put their amazing artifacts on the musem soooo. And all these beautiful ancient pottery in Mallibu and Berlin and Harvard and Boston depicting all these figures that I know since I was a child, when learning about Greek Mythology. Im doing a Prop on this in class and i believe the foreign countries should get back their stolen goods. Paintings appear in the ceiling vault, and sculptures are placed in pedestals. Then it is ok to ask for returning goods. Anyway, your argument is redundant. i have mixed views on this subject as on the one hand its good knoledge and very intresting and informational but on the other you have to understand that the ancient egyptions belived in the after life and this i think will hinder them in some way from have a full after life also we should think about it this way would you like your ancestors put on show with all there worldly goods in all different countries we have to think that back in ancient time they were very strong belivers that they would go onto better things like bacomming gods and do we really have the right to step into that path . a. Next to that, when the English came, the locals didn't care less about the ancient artifacts. (Regarding nations above, its just an example, i did meant it in racist way, but this example can be seen in all over the world.). Pls don;t misunderstund me. Egypt recently announced that it has decided to sue two museums, one in England and one in Belgium for the return two pharaonic relief - or tomb carvings. in his Clan Magazine I turned my attentions to other Scottish artifacts. "Western Imperialists" I guarentee includes yourself/. My country is invaded, by the French, the German, Spain, Norwegian people. They should go back home where they belong! The only problem here is that, if these items would be returned, the museums in which they are housed, or should we more appropriately say, illegally inprisoned in, would lose their income from the tourists visiting and that is the bottom line. What if the natives of the country knew where to find them but didn't want to disturb them because the artifacts were seen as sacred? I then decide that you are not able to propertly protect and care for the item, and I take it home and place it in one of my gallaries. People should keep the artifact to sell to museum.THey have no right to take an artifact from someone who found it. This makes me think of the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act (NAGPRA). Finally, I take issue with the very idea of the universal museum. hi my school is doing a debat on this and i as wondering if anyone has any proof or reason that the artifacts should stay where they presently are. But they won't because the other countries want them as an eyecatcher in a museum so they can make money. Here's a New York Times article about this issue. your point of Great Britain having no history is invalid. you spelled artifacts wrong. I'm not saying that western countries should keep them but we should be wise. What is the purpose of museums? Homepage | Science Buzz What kind of morals are you setting for the future? Not all artifacts should be returned to source countries. Objects have been taken to be sold for profit, saved as souvenirs, and put, in museums. This is the nations history, their culture, their life! Yes they should return to the care of the original nation. That's like saying slavery was ok back in the day because it was still legal back then. Some also argue that this will open up the floodgates, so to speak. The law doesn't always = what's right, and what's right should take precedence when it's obvious. Careful, don't be too sure you are correct with a rebuttal. I believe that the country of origin should have the artifacts.